Introduction
For many investors, the phrase “all-time high” triggers hesitation. Common intuition suggests caution: if markets are at their peak, surely a correction must be imminent. However, the historical data tells a more nuanced story. This article explores whether buying index ETFs, specifically those tracking the S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, and Dow Jones, at all-time highs has been a sound investment decision over the past 50 years. We examine long-term return patterns, analyze valuation signals such as the Shiller CAPE ratio, evaluate the effectiveness of lump-sum investing versus dollar-cost averaging (DCA), and reflect on the psychological challenges of buying into strength.
Historical Context: Record Highs Are the Norm, Not the Exception
It is important to begin by challenging a common misconception: that markets reaching all-time highs signals overvaluation or an impending decline. In reality, markets trend upward over time, and new highs are not anomalies but frequent milestones in long-term bull cycles. Since 1950, the S&P 500 has closed at a new high more than 1,250 times, averaging over 16 record highs per year. Years like 2017 and 2021 saw over 60 new records, demonstrating how common these peaks truly are.
Thus, all-time highs do not necessarily imply that markets are "overbought" or "unsustainable." Instead, they often reflect healthy upward momentum supported by earnings growth, liquidity, or economic resilience.
Empirical Evidence: What Happens After a Peak?
Contrary to the fear that investing at market peaks leads to underperformance, historical returns tell a more constructive story. Looking at data from the past five decades, purchasing ETFs tracking broad indices like SPY (S&P 500), QQQ (Nasdaq-100), or DIA (Dow Jones) at or near all-time highs has, more often than not, resulted in positive returns over 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year horizons.
For example, a study by RBC Global Asset Management found that after a new all-time high in the S&P 500, the index had positive returns one year later in over 90% of cases. Even more tellingly, no 10-year window following a peak ever ended with a negative return exceeding –10%. This illustrates the resilience of the U.S. equity market when viewed from a long-term perspective.
An investor who bought SPY at its then-record high in early 2013 would have seen annualized returns above 10% over the following decade. Even the Nasdaq-100, which is more volatile, has demonstrated similar patterns when measured across multi-year timeframes, although with a wider dispersion due to its sensitivity to tech cycles.
Valuations: The Role of the Shiller CAPE Ratio
While the historical return data supports investing at highs, valuation remains a crucial piece of the puzzle. One widely used valuation metric is the Shiller CAPE ratio (cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings), which smooths earnings over 10 years to account for business cycle effects.
The CAPE ratio has historically been a reasonable predictor of long-term returns. High readings, above 30, have often preceded periods of below-average performance. In the year 2000, for instance, the CAPE rose above 44 during the dot-com bubble, and the Nasdaq subsequently declined by over 75%. Similarly, prior to the 2008 financial crisis, elevated valuations warned of risk, even if investors ignored them at the time.
As of mid-2025, the CAPE is again approaching historically extreme levels, above 38. While this does not imply an immediate market crash, it does suggest that forward 10-year returns may be more modest than the historical average, especially if earnings growth fails to accelerate.
Nevertheless, it is worth noting that elevated CAPE ratios have sometimes coincided with strong subsequent performance. What matters more is whether the high valuation reflects genuine innovation and sustainable profitability (as arguably seen in today's AI-driven tech rally), or speculative excess.
Timing Strategies: Lump-Sum vs Dollar-Cost Averaging
One of the central questions for investors considering entry at a peak is whether to invest all at once or to spread their investment over time through dollar-cost averaging. Intuitively, DCA feels safer, it mitigates the fear of buying just before a drop. However, studies by Vanguard and others have consistently shown that lump-sum investing tends to outperform DCA in roughly two-thirds of historical scenarios.
The reason is simple: markets tend to rise over time. Holding cash while waiting to deploy it gradually can be a drag on returns, especially in bull markets. For instance, investing $100,000 into SPY in early 2019 produced stronger returns over five years when done immediately, compared to phasing in monthly over one year. That said, DCA does offer psychological benefits: it reduces regret and anxiety, especially in volatile environments.
Therefore, the choice between lump-sum and DCA is often less about maximizing returns and more about managing behavioral risk. For investors prone to second-guessing their decisions or who are entering with a large sum at a perceived market high, DCA may offer peace of mind, even if it sacrifices some return.
Behavioral Finance: Why Peaks Make Us Nervous
The discomfort investors feel when buying at highs is deeply rooted in behavioral psychology. Loss aversion, the tendency to fear losses more than we value gains, leads many to avoid entering the market at elevated levels. Recency bias further amplifies the fear, as memories of past corrections are easily recalled and over-weighted in decision-making.
These instincts, while natural, often prove costly. Waiting for a pullback that never comes can leave investors on the sidelines for years. Numerous studies show that time in the market matters more than timing the market. Indeed, one of the worst investment decisions is not buying at the top, but never buying at all.
Final Analysis and Conclusion
The evidence is clear: investing in index ETFs at or near all-time highs has generally been a sound strategy, provided the investment horizon is sufficiently long. Over 5 to 10 years, historical data shows that such purchases frequently yield strong returns, even when valuations are elevated. While short-term volatility or drawdowns can follow peak entries, especially in bubble environments, these tend to be recovered over time.
Nevertheless, high valuations such as those indicated by the CAPE ratio in 2025 should not be ignored. Investors must weigh the trade-off between immediate market exposure and potential short-term overvaluation. A rational approach would be to assess one's risk tolerance, time horizon, and emotional discipline. For long-term investors, entering at all-time highs, whether via lump-sum or gradually through DCA, is more likely to be rewarded than penalized.
In summary, all-time highs are not warnings. They are a feature of upward-trending markets. While they merit scrutiny, they should not prevent participation. Investors equipped with data, discipline, and perspective can navigate them confidently.
Interested in learning more? Check out this related article on Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA) and the risks associated with this strategy.
More about Trading Central
Trading Central is a global leader in financial market research and investment analytics for retail online brokers and institutions. Its product suite provides actionable trading ideas based on technical and fundamental research covering stocks, exchange-traded funds, indexes, forex, options and commodities. Strategy Builder, our stock screener can identify ETF's trading at or near 52-week and all time highs and includes a backtesting feature. Strategy Builder is available through leading retail brokers in Canada and worldwide.
.png)
.png)
